_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 2 proof by cumbersome notation: Best done with access to at least four alphabets and special symbols. proof by exhaustion: An issue or two of a journal devoted to your proof is useful. proof by omission: 'The reader may easily supply the details' 'The other 253 cases are analogous' '..'
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__ /^\
.' \ / :.\
/ \ | :: \
/ /. \ / ::: |
| |::. \ / :::'/
| / \::. | / :::'/
`--` \' `~~~ ':'/`
/ (
/ 0 _ 0 \
\/ \_/ \/
-== '.' | '.' ==-
/\ '-^-' /\
\ _ _ /
.-`-((\o/))-`-.
_ / //^\\ \ _
."o".( , .:::. , )."o".
|o o\\ \:::::/ //o o|
\ \\ |:::::| // /
\ \\__/:::::\__// /
\ .:.\ `':::'` /.:. /
\':: |_ _| ::'/
`---` `"""""` `---`
xcalc